Paper detail

An extended $k-\varepsilon$ model for wake-flow simulation of wind farms

The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach coupled with the standard $k-\varepsilon$ model is widely utilized for wind-energy applications. However, it has been shown that the standard $k-\varepsilon$ model overestimates the turbulence intensity in the wake region and, consequently, overpredicts the power output of the waked turbines. This study focuses on the development of an extended $k-\varepsilon$ model by incorporating an additional term in the turbulent kinetic energy equation. This term accounts for the influence of turbine-induced forces, and its formulation is derived through an analytical approach. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed model, we begin by analyzing the evolution of normalized velocity deficit and turbulence intensity in the wake region, and the normalized power of the waked turbines. This investigation involves a comparison of the predictions against results from large-eddy simulations in three validation cases with different layouts. We then simulate a wind farm consisting of 30 wind turbines and conduct a comparative analysis between the model-predicted normalized streamwise velocity and wind-tunnel measurements. Finally, to conclude our assessment of the proposed model, we apply it to the operational wind farm of Horns Rev 1 and evaluate the obtained normalized power with the results from large-eddy simulations. The comparisons and validations conducted in this study prove the superior performance of the extended $k-\varepsilon$ model compared to the standard version.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.