Paper detail

An Exploratory Data Survey of Drug Name Incidence and Prevalence From the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System, 2004 to 2012Q2

Drug Names, Population Level Surveillance and the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System: An Exploratory Data Survey of Drug Name Incidence and Prevalence, 2004-2012Q2 Purpose: To count and monitor the drug names reported in the publicly available version of the Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2012Q2 in a maximized sensitivity relational model. Methods: Data mining and data modeling was conducted and event based summary statistics with plots were created from over nine continuous years of continuous FAERS data. Results: This FAERS model contains 344,452 individual drug names and 432,541,994 count references which occurred across 4,148,761 human subjects in the 34 quarter study period. Plots for the top 100 scoring drug name references are reported by year and quarter; the top 100 drug names contain 143,384,240 references or 33% of all drug name references over 34 quarters of continuous FAERS data. Conclusions: While FAERS contains many drugs and adverse event reports, its data pertains to very few of them. Drug name incidence lends timely and effective surveillance of large populations of Averse Event Reports and does not require the cause of the AE, nor its validity to be known to detect a mass poisoning.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.