Paper detail

An Explanation of the Differences in Diffusivity of the Components of the Metallic Glass Pd43Cu27Ni10P20

Bartsch et al. [A. Bartsch, K. Raetzke, A. Meyer, and F. Faupel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195901 (2010)] reported measurements of the diffusivities of different components of the multi-component bulk metallic glass Pd43Cu27Ni10P20. The diffusion of the largest Pd and the smallest P were found to be drastically different. The Stokes-Einstein relation breaks down when considering the P constituent atom, while the relation is obeyed by the Pd atom over 14 orders of magnitude of change in Pd diffusivity. This difference in behavior of Pd and P poses a problem challenging for explanation. With the assist of a recent finding in metallic glasses that the beta-relaxation and the diffusion of the smallest component are closely related processes by Yu et al. [H. B. Yu, K. Samwer, Y. Wu, and W. H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 095508 (2012)], we use the Coupling Model (CM) to explain the observed difference between P and Pd quantitatively. The same model also explains the correlation between property of the beta-relaxation with fragility found in the family of (CexLa1-x)68Al10Cu20Co2.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.