Paper detail

An Explanation for the Slopes of Stellar Cusps in Galaxy Spheroids

The stellar surface mass density profiles at the centers of typical ~L* and lower-mass spheroids exhibit power law 'cusps' with $Σ\propto R^(-n)$, where 0.5<n<1 for radii ~1-100 pc. Observations and theory support models in which these cusps are formed by dissipative gas inflows and nuclear starbursts in gas-rich mergers. At these comparatively large radii, stellar relaxation is unlikely to account for or strongly modify the cuspy stellar profiles. We argue that the power-law surface density profiles observed are a natural consequence of the gravitational instabilities that dominate angular momentum transport in the gravitational potential of a central massive black hole. The dominant mode at these radii is an m=1 lopsided/eccentric disk instability, in which stars torquing the gas can drive rapid inflow and accretion. Such a mode first generically appears at large radii and propagates inwards by exciting eccentricities at smaller and smaller radii, where M*(<R)<<M_BH. When the stellar surface density profile is comparatively shallow with n<1/2, the modes cannot efficiently propagate to R=0 and so gas piles up and star formation steepens the profile. But if the profile is steeper than n=1, the inwards propagation of eccentricity is strongly damped, suppressing inflow and bringing n down again. Together these results produce an equilibrium slope of 1/2 < n < 1 in the potential of the central black hole. These physical arguments are supported by nonlinear numerical simulations of gas inflow in galactic nuclei. Together, these results naturally explain the observed stellar density profiles of 'cusp' elliptical galaxies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.