Paper detail

An experimental study of morphological formation in bilayered tubular structures driven by swelling/growth

This paper presents an experimental investigation on pattern formation and evolution in bilayered tubular organs using swelling deformation of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and aims at supplying a thorough comparison with theoretical and finite element results. To create a twin model in modelling and simulation, the shear modulus in the incompressible neo-Hookean material is estimated via uni-axial tensile and pure shear tests. Five bilayered tubes with different material or geometrical parameters are fabricated. Swelling experiments are carried out for these samples in an individual experimental setup where a plane-strain deformation is guaranteed, and several surface patterns and the associated mode transformations are observed, namely, creases, wrinkles, period-doubling profiles, wrinkle-to-crease transition, and wrinkle-to-period-doubling transition. In particular, an interfacial wrinkling pattern is also observed. To make comparisons, a buckling analysis is conducted within the framework of finite elasticity by means of the Stroh formulation. In addition, a finite element analysis is performed to trace the evolution of surface instabilities. It turns out that the experimental findings agree well with the theoretical predictions as well as the finite element results. From our experiments, it is found that creasing mode may appear instead of wrinkling mode when both layers share a similar mechanical property. It is expected that the current work could provide novel experimental insight into pattern formation in tubular structures, and the good agreement among experimental, theoretical, and simulation consequences supplies strong evidence that a phenomenological growth model is satisfactory to reveal mechanisms behind intricate surface morphology in tubular tissues.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.