Paper detail

An Excessive Core Collapse in Nbody Cosmological simulations

The particle mass used in cosmology N-body simulations is close to $10^{8}M_{\odot}$, which is about $10^{65}$ times larger than the GeV scale expected in particle physics. However, self-gravity interacting particle systems made up of different particles mass have different statistical and dynamical properties. Here we demonstrate that, due to this particle mass difference, the nowaday cosmology N-body simulations can have introduced an excessive core collapse process, especially for the low mass halos at high redshift. Such dynamical effect introduces an excessive cuspy center for these small halos, and it implies a possible connection to the so called "small scale crisis" for CDM models. Our results show that there exist a physical limit in cosmological simulations, by using about $10^3$ particles to describe smallest halos, and we provide a simple suggestion based on it to relieve those effects from the bias.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.