Paper detail

An exact Ramsey number of large bipartite graphs versus odd wheel

The Ramsey number for the pair of graphs $\mathbb{K}_{1,n}$ (star) versus $W_{m}$ (wheel) has been extensively studied. In contrast, the Ramsey number of $\mathbb{K}_{2,n}$ versus the wheel is not yet explored due to the bit more structural complexity of $\mathbb{K}_{2,n}$ compared to the star. In this article, we have established an exact value of $\mathbb{K}_{2,n}$ versus $W_{m}$ for large $n$ and $m$. In particular, we have proved \begin{equation*} R(\mathbb{K}_{2,n}, W_{m})=3n+4, \end{equation*} whenever $n$ and $m$ are sufficiently large integers satisfying $n\geq4m$ and $m$ is an odd integer. This proves the $W_{m}$-goodness of $\mathbb{K}_{2,n}$. Our proof combines probabilistic methods with an analysis of structural dependencies. As part of the argument, we resolve a structural rigidity question concerning highly dependent neighbourhoods (Lemma 3.12).

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.