An exact characterization of tractable demand patterns for maximum disjoint path problems

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study the following general disjoint paths problem: given a supply graph GG, a set T⊆V(G)T\subseteq V(G) of terminals, a demand graph HH on the vertices TT, and an integer kk, the task is to find a set of kk pairwise vertex-disjoint valid paths, where we say that a path of the supply graph GG is valid if its endpoints are in TT and adjacent in the demand graph HH. For a class H\mathcal{H} of graphs, we denote by H\mathcal{H}-Maximum Disjoint Paths the restriction of this problem when the demand graph HH is assumed to be a member of H\mathcal{H}. We study the fixed-parameter tractability of this family of problems, parameterized by kk. Our main result is a complete characterization of the fixed-parameter tractable cases of H\mathcal{H}-Maximum Disjoint Paths for every hereditary class H\mathcal{H} of graphs: it turns out that complexity depends on the existence of large induced matchings and large induced skew bicliques in the demand graph HH (a skew biclique is a bipartite graph on vertices a1a_1, …\dots, ana_n, b1b_1, …\dots, bnb_n with aia_i and bjb_j being adjacent if and only if i≤ji\le j). Specifically, we prove the following classification for every hereditary class H\mathcal{H}. 1. If H\mathcal{H} does not contain every matching and does not contain every skew biclique, then H\mathcal{H}-Maximum Disjoint Paths is FPT. 2. If H\mathcal{H} does not contain every matching, but contains every skew biclique, then H\mathcal{H}-Maximum Disjoint Paths is W[1]-hard, admits an FPT approximation, and the valid paths satisfy an analog of the Erdős-Pósa property. 3. If H\mathcal{H} contains every matching, then H\mathcal{H}-Maximum Disjoint Paths is W[1]-hard and the valid paths do not satisfy the analog of the Erdős-Pósa property.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.