Paper detail

An exact characterization of tractable demand patterns for maximum disjoint path problems

We study the following general disjoint paths problem: given a supply graph $G$, a set $T\subseteq V(G)$ of terminals, a demand graph $H$ on the vertices $T$, and an integer $k$, the task is to find a set of $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint valid paths, where we say that a path of the supply graph $G$ is valid if its endpoints are in $T$ and adjacent in the demand graph $H$. For a class $\mathcal{H}$ of graphs, we denote by $\mathcal{H}$-Maximum Disjoint Paths the restriction of this problem when the demand graph $H$ is assumed to be a member of $\mathcal{H}$. We study the fixed-parameter tractability of this family of problems, parameterized by $k$. Our main result is a complete characterization of the fixed-parameter tractable cases of $\mathcal{H}$-Maximum Disjoint Paths for every hereditary class $\mathcal{H}$ of graphs: it turns out that complexity depends on the existence of large induced matchings and large induced skew bicliques in the demand graph $H$ (a skew biclique is a bipartite graph on vertices $a_1$, $\dots$, $a_n$, $b_1$, $\dots$, $b_n$ with $a_i$ and $b_j$ being adjacent if and only if $i\le j$). Specifically, we prove the following classification for every hereditary class $\mathcal{H}$. 1. If $\mathcal{H}$ does not contain every matching and does not contain every skew biclique, then $\mathcal{H}$-Maximum Disjoint Paths is FPT. 2. If $\mathcal{H}$ does not contain every matching, but contains every skew biclique, then $\mathcal{H}$-Maximum Disjoint Paths is W[1]-hard, admits an FPT approximation, and the valid paths satisfy an analog of the Erdős-Pósa property. 3. If $\mathcal{H}$ contains every matching, then $\mathcal{H}$-Maximum Disjoint Paths is W[1]-hard and the valid paths do not satisfy the analog of the Erdős-Pósa property.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.