Paper detail

An Evolutionary Model for Collapsing Molecular Clouds and Their Star Formation Activity

We present an idealized, semi-empirical model for the evolution of gravitationally contracting molecular clouds (MCs) and their star formation rate (SFR) and efficiency (SFE). The model assumes that the instantaneous SFR is given by the mass above a certain density threshold divided by its free-fall time. The instantaneous number of massive stars is computed assuming a Kroupa IMF. These stars feed back on the cloud through ionizing radiation, eroding it. The main controlling parameter of the evolution turns out to be the maximum cloud mass, $\Mmax$. This allows us to compare various properties of the model clouds against their observational counterparts. A giant molecular cloud (GMC) model ($\Mmax \sim 10^5 \Msun$) adheres very well to the evolutionary scenario recently inferred by Kawamura et al. (2009) for GMCs in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A model cloud with $\Mmax \approx 2000 \Msun$ evolves in the Kennicutt-Schmidt diagram first passing through the locus of typical low- to-intermediate mass star-forming clouds, and then moving towards the locus of high-mass star-forming ones over the course of $\sim 10$ Myr. Also, the stellar age histograms for this cloud a few Myr before its destruction agree very well with those observed in the $ρ$-Oph stellar association, whose parent cloud has a similar mass, and imply that the SFR of the clouds increases with time. Our model thus agrees well with various observed properties of star-forming MCs, suggesting that the scenario of gravitationally collapsing MCs, with their SFR regulated by stellar feedback, is entirely feasible and in agreement with key observed properties of molecular clouds.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.