Paper detail

An Evaluation of Intra-Transaction Parallelism in Actor-Relational Database Systems

Over the past decade, we have witnessed a dramatic evolution in main-memory capacity and multi-core parallelism of server hardware. To leverage this hardware potential, multi-core in-memory OLTP database systems have been extensively re-designed. The core objective of this re-design has been scaling up sequential execution of OLTP transactions, wherein alternative database architectures have been explored to eliminate system bottlenecks and overheads impeding inter-transaction parallelism to fully manifest. However, intra-transaction parallelism has been largely ignored by this previous work. We conjecture this situation to have developed because OLTP workloads are sometimes deemed to have far too little intra-transactional parallelism and, even when this kind of parallelism is available, program analyses to recognize it in arbitrary stored procedures are considered too brittle to be used as a general tool. Recently, however, a new concept of actor-relational database systems has been proposed, raising hopes that application developers can specify intra-transaction parallelism by modeling database applications as communicating actors. In this scenario, a natural question is whether an actor-relational database system with an asynchronous programming model can adequately expose the intra-transaction parallelism available in application logic to modern multi-core hardware. Towards that aim, we conduct in this paper an experimental evaluation of the factors that affect intra-transaction parallelism in the prototype actor-relational database system REACTDB, with an OLTP application designed with task-level parallelism in mind, and with the system running on a multi-core machine.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.