Paper detail

An estimate of the stochastic gravitational wave background from the MassiveBlackII simulation

A population of super-massive black hole binaries is expected to generate a stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) in the pulsar timing array (PTA) frequency range of $10^{-9}$--$10^{-7}$ Hz. Detection of this signal is a current observational goal and so predictions of its characteristics are of significant interest. In this work we use super-massive black hole binary mergers from the MassiveBlackII simulation to estimate the characteristic strain of the stochastic background. We examine both a gravitational wave driven model of binary evolution and a model which also includes the effects of stellar scattering and a circumbinary gas disk. Results are consistent with PTA upper limits and similar to estimates in the literature. The characteristic strain at a reference frequency of $1 yr^{-1}$ is found to be $A_{yr^{-1}} = 6.9 \times 10^{-16}$ and $A_{yr^{-1}} = 6.4 \times 10^{-16}$ in the gravitational-wave driven and stellar scattering/gas disk cases, respectively. Using the latter approach, our models show that the SGWB is mildly suppressed compared to the purely gravitational wave driven model as frequency decreases inside the PTA frequency band.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.