Paper detail

An Erd{\H o}s-Ko-Rado theorem for permutations with fixed number of cycles

Let $S_{n}$ denote the set of permutations of $[n]=\{1,2,\dots, n\}$. For a positive integer $k$, define $S_{n,k}$ to be the set of all permutations of $[n]$ with exactly $k$ disjoint cycles, i.e., \[ S_{n,k} = \{π\in S_{n}: π= c_{1}c_{2} \cdots c_{k}\},\] where $c_1,c_2,\dots ,c_k$ are disjoint cycles. The size of $S_{n,k}$ is given by $\left [ \begin{matrix}n\\ k \end{matrix}\right]=(-1)^{n-k}s(n,k)$, where $s(n,k)$ is the Stirling number of the first kind. A family $\mathcal{A} \subseteq S_{n,k}$ is said to be $t$-{\em intersecting} if any two elements of $\mathcal{A}$ have at least $t$ common cycles. In this paper, we show that, given any positive integers $k,t$ with $k\geq t+1$, there exists an integer $n_0=n_0(k,t)$, such that for all $n\geq n_0$, if $\mathcal{A} \subseteq S_{n,k}$ is $t$-intersecting, then \[ |\mathcal{A}| \le \left [ \begin{matrix}n-t\\ k-t \end{matrix}\right],\] with equality if and only if $\mathcal{A}$ is the stabiliser of $t$ fixed points.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.