Paper detail

An end-to-end KNN-based PTV approach for high-resolution measurements and uncertainty quantification

We introduce a novel end-to-end approach to improving the resolution of PIV measurements. The method blends information from different snapshots without the need for time-resolved measurements on grounds of similarity of flow regions in different snapshots. The main hypothesis is that, with a sufficiently large ensemble of statistically-independent snapshots, the identification of flow structures that are morphologically similar but occurring at different time instants is feasible. Measured individual vectors from different snapshots with similar flow organisation can thus be merged, resulting in an artificially increased particle concentration. This allows to refine the interrogation region and, consequently, increase the spatial resolution. The measurement domain is split in subdomains. The similarity is enforced only on a local scale, i.e. morphologically-similar regions are sought only among subdomains corresponding to the same flow region. The identification of locally-similar snapshots is based on unsupervised K-nearest neighbours search in a space of significant flow features. Such features are defined in terms of a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, performed in subdomains on the original low-resolution data, obtained either with standard cross-correlation or with binning of Particle Tracking Velocimetry data with a relatively large bin size. A refined bin size is then selected according to the number of "sufficiently close" snapshots identified. The statistical dispersion of the velocity vectors within the bin is then used to estimate the uncertainty and to select the optimal K which minimises it. The method is tested and validated against datasets with a progressively increasing level of complexity: two virtual experiments based on direct simulations of the wake of a fluidic pinball and a channel flow and the experimental data collected in a turbulent boundary layer.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.