Paper detail

An End-to-End AI-Based Framework for Automated Discovery of CEST/MT MR Fingerprinting Acquisition Protocols and Quantitative Deep Reconstruction (AutoCEST)

Purpose: To develop an automated machine-learning-based method for the discovery of rapid and quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MR fingerprinting acquisition and reconstruction protocols. Methods: An MR physics governed AI system was trained to generate optimized acquisition schedules and the corresponding quantitative reconstruction neural-network. The system (termed AutoCEST) is composed of a CEST saturation block, a spin dynamics module, and a deep reconstruction network, all differentiable and jointly connected. The method was validated using a variety of chemical exchange phantoms and an in-vivo mouse brain at 9.4T. Results: The acquisition times for AutoCEST optimized schedules ranged from 35-71s, with a quantitative image reconstruction time of only 29 ms. The resulting exchangeable proton concentration maps for the phantoms were in good agreement with the known solute concentrations for AutoCEST sequences (mean absolute error = 2.42 mM; Pearson&#39;s r=0.992 , p$<$0.0001), but not for an unoptimized sequence (mean absolute error = 65.19 mM; Pearson&#39;s r=-0.161, p=0.522). Similarly, improved exchange rate agreement was observed between AutoCEST and quantification of exchange using saturation power (QUESP) methods (mean absolute error: 35.8 Hz, Pearson&#39;s r=0.971, p$<$0.0001) compared to an unoptimized schedule and QUESP (mean absolute error = 58.2 Hz; Pearson&#39;s r=0.959, p$<$0.0001). The AutoCEST in-vivo mouse brain semi-solid proton volume-fractions were lower in the cortex (12.21$\pm$1.37%) compared to the white-matter (19.73 $\pm$ 3.30%), as expected, and the amide proton volume-fraction and exchange rates agreed with previous reports. Conclusion: AutoCEST can automatically generate optimized CEST/MT acquisition protocols that can be rapidly reconstructed into quantitative exchange parameter maps.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.