Paper detail

An empty interval in the spectrum of small weight codewords in the code from points and k-spaces of PG(n, q)

Let Ck(n, q) be the p-ary linear code defined by the incidence matrix of points and k-spaces in PG(n, q), q = p^h, p prime, h >= 1. In this pa- per, we show that there are no codewords of weight in the open interval ] q^{k+1}-1/q-1, 2q^k[ in Ck(n, q) \ Cn-k(n, q) which implies that there are no codewords with this weight in Ck(n, q) \ Ck(n, q) if k >= n/2. In par- ticular, for the code Cn-1(n, q) of points and hyperplanes of PG(n, q), we exclude all codewords in Cn-1(n, q) with weight in the open interval ] q^n-1/q-1, 2q^n-1[. This latter result implies a sharp bound on the weight of small weight codewords of Cn-1(n, q), a result which was previously only known for general dimension for q prime and q = p2, with p prime, p > 11, and in the case n = 2, for q = p^3, p >= 7 ([4],[5],[7],[8]).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.