Paper detail

An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Lyα and UV selected Galaxies: Do Theorists and Observers `Select' the Same Objects?

Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) are galaxies that have been selected on the basis of a strong Lyα emission line in their spectra. Observational campaigns have dramatically increased the sample of known LAEs, which now extends out to z=7. These discoveries have motivated numerous theoretical studies on the subject, which usually define LAEs in their models based on sharp Lyα luminosity and equivalent width (EW) cuts. While broadly representative, this procedure does not mimic the selection from observational programs in detail, which instead use cuts in various colour-spaces. We investigate what implications this disjoint may have for studies that aim to model LAEs. We construct an empirical model for the number density of star forming galaxies as a function of their UV and Lyα luminosity, utilising measured constraints on the luminosity functions (LFs) of drop-out galaxies, and their luminosity dependent probability distribution function of Lyα EW. In particular, we investigate whether the LAE LFs can be reproduced by defining LAEs using a (z-dependent) Lyα luminosity and EW threshold. While we are able to reproduce the observed distribution of Lyα EW among LAEs out to restframe EW 200 A, we find that our formalism over-predicts both the UV and Lyα LFs of LAEs by a factor of 2-3, and is inconsistent with observations at the ~95% level. This tension is partially resolved if we assume the Lyα EW-distribution of drop-out galaxies to be truncated at restframe EW>150 A. However the overprediction indicates that modeling LAEs with simple REW and luminosity cuts does not accurately mimic observed selection criteria, and can lead to uncertainties in the predicted number density of LAEs. On the other hand, the predicted z-evolution is not affected. We apply our formalism to drop-out galaxies at z>6, and predict the LFs of LAEs at z=7-9.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.