Paper detail

An empirical model for feedforward control of laser powder bed fusion

While considerable progress has recently been made in real-time melt pool monitoring for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), results in in-situ melt pool control are relatively sparse, a major reason being lack of suitable control-oriented models. This study demonstrates an empirical control-oriented model of geometry-dependent melt pool behavior, and subsequent melt pool regulation with a model-based feedforward controller for laser power. First, it shows that the melt pool "footprint" exponentially increases when the scan lines become shorter. The empirical model of this behavior is developed and validated on different geometries at different laser power levels. Second, the developed model is used to design a feedforward controller for obtaining optimal laser power profiles. This controller is then validated experimentally and is demonstrated to suppress the in-layer geometry-related melt pool signal deviations, for different part geometries.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.