Paper detail

An Empirical Fit for Viscoelastic Simulations of Tertiary Tides

Tertiary tides (TTs), or the continuous tidal distortion of the tertiary in a hierarchical triple system, can extract energy from the inner binary, inducing within it a proclivity to merge. Despite previous work on the subject, which established that it is significant for certain close triple systems, it is still not a well-understood process. A portion of our ignorance in this regard stems from our inability to integrate a simulation of this phenomenon into conventional stellar evolution codes, since full calculations of these tidal interactions are computationally expensive on stellar evolution timescales. Thus, to attain a better understanding of how these TTs act on longer timescales, an empirical expression of its effects as a function of parameters of the triple system involved is required. In our work, we evaluate the rate at which TTs extract energy from the inner binary within a series of constructed hierarchical triple systems under varying parameters, and study the rate at which the inner binary orbital separation shrinks as a function of those parameters. We find that this rate varies little with the absolute values of the masses of the three component objects, but is very sensitive to the mass ratio of the inner binary $q$, the tertiary radius $R_{\rm 3}$, the inner binary orbital separation $a_{\rm 1}$, the outer orbital separation $a_{\rm 2}$, and the viscoelastic relaxation time of the tertiary $τ$. More specifically, we find that the percentage by which $a_{\rm 1}$ shrinks per unit time can be reasonably approximated by (1/$a_{\rm 1}$)(d$a_{\rm 1}$/d$t$)=$\left(2.22{\times}10^{-8}{\rm yrs}^{-1}\right)4q\left(1+q\right)^{-2}(R_{\rm 3}/100{\rm R}_{\odot})^{5.2}(a_{\rm 1}/0.2{\rm AU})^{4.8}(a_{\rm 2}/2{\rm AU})^{-10.2}$ $(τ/0.534{\rm yrs})^{-1.0}$. We also provide tests of how precise this fitting function is.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.