Paper detail

An Empirical Determination of the Dust Mass Absorption Coefficient, $κ_{d}$, Using the Herschel Reference Survey

We use the published photometry and spectroscopy of 22 galaxies in the Herschel Reference Survey to determine that the value of the dust mass absorption coefficient $κ_{d}$ at a wavelength of 500 $μm$ is $κ_{500} = 0.051^{+0.070}_{-0.026}\,{\rm m^{2}\,kg^{-1}}$. We do so by taking advantage of the fact that the dust-to-metals ratio in the interstellar medium of galaxies appears to be constant. We argue that our value for $κ_{d}$ supersedes that of James et al. (2002) -- who pioneered this approach for determining $κ_{d}$ -- because we take advantage of superior data, and account for a number of significant systematic effects that they did not consider. We comprehensively incorporate all methodological and observational contributions to establish the uncertainty on our value, which represents a marked improvement on the oft-quoted 'order-of-magnitude' uncertainty on $κ_{d}$. We find no evidence that the value of $κ_{d}$ differs significantly between galaxies, or that it correlates with any other measured or derived galaxy properties. We note, however, that the availability of data limits our sample to relatively massive ($10^{9.7}<{M_{\star}}<10^{11.0}\ {\rm M_{\odot}}$), high metallicity ($8.61<[12+{\rm log}_{10}\frac{O}{H}]<8.86$) galaxies; future work will allow us to investigate a wider range of systems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.