Paper detail

An empirical analysis of information encoded in disentangled neural speaker representations

The primary characteristic of robust speaker representations is that they are invariant to factors of variability not related to speaker identity. Disentanglement of speaker representations is one of the techniques used to improve robustness of speaker representations to both intrinsic factors that are acquired during speech production (e.g., emotion, lexical content) and extrinsic factors that are acquired during signal capture (e.g., channel, noise). Disentanglement in neural speaker representations can be achieved either in a supervised fashion with annotations of the nuisance factors (factors not related to speaker identity) or in an unsupervised fashion without labels of the factors to be removed. In either case it is important to understand the extent to which the various factors of variability are entangled in the representations. In this work, we examine speaker representations with and without unsupervised disentanglement for the amount of information they capture related to a suite of factors. Using classification experiments we provide empirical evidence that disentanglement reduces the information with respect to nuisance factors from speaker representations, while retaining speaker information. This is further validated by speaker verification experiments on the VOiCES corpus in several challenging acoustic conditions. We also show improved robustness in speaker verification tasks using data augmentation during training of disentangled speaker embeddings. Finally, based on our findings, we provide insights into the factors that can be effectively separated using the unsupervised disentanglement technique and discuss potential future directions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.