Paper detail

An Elementary Proof of the Minimal Euclidean Function on the Gaussian Integers

Every Euclidean domain $R$ has a minimal Euclidean function, $ϕ_R$. A companion paper \cite{Graves} introduced a formula to compute $ϕ_{\mathbb{Z}[i]}$. It is the first formula for a minimal Euclidean function for the ring of integers of a non-trivial number field. It did so by studying the geometry of the set $B_n = \left \{ \sum_{j=0}^n v_j (1+i)^j : v_j \in \{0, \pm 1, \pm i \} \right \}$ and then applied Lenstra's result that $ϕ_{\mathbb{Z}[i]}^{-1}([0,n]) = B_n$ to provide a short proof of $ϕ_{\mathbb{Z}[i]}$. Lenstra's proof requires s substantial algebra background. This paper uses the new geometry of the sets $B_n$ to prove the formula for $ϕ_{\mathbb{Z}[i]}$ without using Lenstra's result. The new geometric method lets us prove Lenstra's theorem using only elementary methods. We then apply the new formula to answer Pierre Samuel's open question: what is the size of $ϕ_{\mathbb{Z}[i]}^{-1}(n)$?. Appendices provide a table of answers and the associated SAGE code.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.