Paper detail

An efficient search algorithm for inverting the sweep map on rational Dyck paths

Given a coprime pair $(m,n)$ of positive integers, rational $(m,n)$-Dyck paths are lattice paths in the $m\times n$ rectangle that never go below the diagonal. The sweep map of a rational $(m,n)$-Dyck paths $D$ is the rational Dyck path $Φ(D)$ obtained by sorting the steps of $D$ according to the ranks of their starting points, where the rank of $(a,b)$ is $bm-an$. It is conjectured to be a bijection, but to this date, $Φ$ is only known to be bijective for the Fuss case ($m=kn\pm 1$). In this paper we give an efficient search algorithm for inverting the $Φ$ map. Roughly speaking, given $σ\in \cal D_{m,n}$, by searching through a $d$-array tree of certain depth, we can output all $D$ such that $Φ(D)=σ$, where $d$ is the remainder of $m$ when divided by $n$. In particular, we show that $Φ$ is invertible for the Fuss case by giving a simple recursive construction for $Φ^{-1} (σ)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.