Paper detail

An efficient and quantitative phase-field model for elastically heterogeneous two-phase solids based on a partial rank-one homogenization scheme

This paper presents an efficient and quantitative phase-field model for elastically heterogeneous alloys that ensures the two mechanical compatibilities$\unicode{x2014}$static and kinematic, in conjunction with chemical equilibrium within the interfacial region. Our model contrasts with existing phase-field models that either violate static compatibility or interfacial chemical equilibrium or are computationally costly. For computational efficiency, the partial rank-one homogenization (PRH) scheme is employed to enforce both static and kinematic compatibilities at the interface. Moreover, interfacial chemical equilibrium is ensured by replacing the composition field with the diffusion potential field as the independent variable of the model. Its performance is demonstrated by simulating four single-particle and one multi-particle cases for two binary two-phase alloys: Ni-Al $γ^{\prime}/γ$ and UO$_2$/void. Its accuracy is then investigated against analytical solutions. For the single-particle $γ^{\prime}/γ$ alloy, we find that the accuracy of the phase-field results remains unaffected for both planar and non-planar geometries when the PRH scheme is employed. Fortuitously, in the UO$_2$/void simulations, despite a strong elastic heterogeneity$\unicode{x2014}$the ratio of Young's modulus of the void phase to that of the UO$_2$ phase is $10^{-4}\unicode{x2014}$we find that the PRH scheme shows significantly better convergence compared to the Voigt-Taylor scheme (VTS) for both planar and non-planar geometries. Nevertheless, for the same interface width range as in the $γ^{'}/γ$ case, the interface migration in these simulations shows dependence on interface width. Contrary to the $γ^{\prime}/γ$ simulations, we also find that the simulated elastic fields show deviations from the analytical solution in the non-planar UO$_2$/void case using the PRH scheme.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.