Paper detail

An Efficient Algorithm for the Partitioning Min-Max Weighted Matching Problem

The Partitioning Min-Max Weighted Matching (PMMWM) problem is an NP-hard problem that combines the problem of partitioning a group of vertices of a bipartite graph into disjoint subsets with limited size and the classical Min-Max Weighted Matching (MMWM) problem. Kress et al. proposed this problem in 2015 and they also provided several algorithms, among which MP$_{\text{LS}}$ is the state-of-the-art. In this work, we observe there is a time bottleneck in the matching phase of MP$_{\text{LS}}$. Hence, we optimize the redundant operations during the matching iterations, and propose an efficient algorithm called the MP$_{\text{KM-M}}$ that greatly speeds up MP$_{\text{LS}}$. The bottleneck time complexity is optimized from $O(n^3)$ to $O(n^2)$. We also prove the correctness of MP$_{\text{KM-M}}$ by the primal-dual method. To test the performance on diverse instances, we generate various types and sizes of benchmarks, and carried out an extensive computational study on the performance of MP$_{\text{KM-M}}$ and MP$_{\text{LS}}$. The evaluation results show that our MP$_{\text{KM-M}}$ greatly shortens the runtime as compared with MP$_{\text{LS}}$ while yielding the same solution quality.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.