Paper detail

An Effective Description of the Landscape - I

We study under what conditions massive fields can be "frozen" rather than integrated out in certain four dimensional theories with global or local N=1 supersymmetry. We focus on models without gauge fields, admitting a superpotential of the form W = W0(H) + epsilon W1(H,L), with epsilon << 1, where H and L schematically denote the heavy and light chiral superfields. We find that the fields H can always be frozen to constant values H0, if they approximately correspond to supersymmetric solutions along the H directions, independently of the form of the Kahler potential K for H and L, provided K is sufficiently regular. In supergravity W0 is required to be of order epsilon at the vacuum to ensure a mass hierarchy between H and L. The backreaction induced by the breaking of supersymmetry on the heavy fields is always negligible, leading to suppressed F^H--terms. For factorizable Kahler potentials W0 can instead be generic. Our results imply that the common way complex structure and dilaton moduli are stabilized, as in Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 by Kachru et al., for instance, is reliable to a very good accuracy, provided W0 is small enough.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.