Paper detail

An averaged form of Chowla's conjecture

Let $λ$ denote the Liouville function. A well known conjecture of Chowla asserts that for any distinct natural numbers $h_1,\dots,h_k$, one has $\sum_{1 \leq n \leq X} λ(n+h_1) \dotsm λ(n+h_k) = o(X)$ as $X \to \infty$. This conjecture remains unproven for any $h_1,\dots,h_k$ with $k \geq 2$. In this paper, using the recent results of the first two authors on mean values of multiplicative functions in short intervals, combined with an argument of Katai and Bourgain-Sarnak-Ziegler, we establish an averaged version of this conjecture, namely $$\sum_{h_1,\dots,h_k \leq H} \left|\sum_{1 \leq n \leq X} λ(n+h_1) \dotsm λ(n+h_k)\right| = o(H^kX)$$ as $X \to \infty$ whenever $H = H(X) \leq X$ goes to infinity as $X \to \infty$, and $k$ is fixed. Related to this, we give the exponential sum estimate $$ \int_0^X \left|\sum_{x \leq n \leq x+H} λ(n) e(αn)\right| dx = o( HX )$$ as $X \to \infty$ uniformly for all $α\in \mathbb{R}$, with $H$ as before. Our arguments in fact give quantitative bounds on the decay rate (roughly on the order of $\frac{\log\log H}{\log H}$), and extend to more general bounded multiplicative functions than the Liouville function, yielding an averaged form of a (corrected) conjecture of Elliott.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.