Paper detail

An Asymptotic Approximation of TCP CUBIC

In this paper, we derive an expression for computing average window size of a single TCP CUBIC connection under random losses. Throughput expression for TCP CUBIC has been computed earlier under deterministic periodic packet losses. We validate this expression theoretically. We then use insights from the deterministic loss based model to derive an expression for computing average window size of a single TCP CUBIC connection under random losses. For this computation, we first consider the sequence of TCP CUBIC window evolution processes indexed by the drop rate, p and show that with a suitable scaling this sequence converges to a limiting Markov chain as p tends to 0. The stationary distribution of the limiting Markov chain is then used to derive the average window size for small packet error rates. We validate our model and approximations via simulations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.