Paper detail

An Asymmetrical Model for High Energy Radiation of Cassiopeia A

Cassiopeia A (Cas A) supernova remnant shows strong radiation from radio to gamma-ray bands. The mechanism of gamma-ray radiation in Cas A and its possible contribution to PeV cosmic rays are still under debate. The X-ray imaging reveals an asymmetric profile of Cas A, suggesting the existence of a jet-like structure. In this work, we propose an asymmetrical model for Cas A, consisting of a fast moving jet-like structure and a slowly expanding isotropic shell. This model can account for the multi-wavelength spectra of Cas A, especially for the power-law hard X-ray spectrum from $\sim$ 60 to 220 keV. The GeV to TeV emission from Cas A should be contributed by both hadronic and leptonic processes. Moreover, the jet-like structure may produce a gamma-ray flux of $\sim 10^{-13}\rm erg\ cm^{-2}\ s^{-1}$ at $\sim 100$ TeV, to be examined by LHAASO and CTA.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.