Paper detail

An assessment of implicit-explicit time integrators for the pseudo-spectral approximation of Boussinesq thermal convection in an annulus

We analyze the behaviour of an ensemble of time integrators applied to the semi-discrete problem resulting from the spectral discretization of the equations describing Boussinesq convection in a cylindrical annulus. The equations are cast in a vorticity-streamfunction formulation that yields a differential algebraic equation (DAE). The ensemble comprises 28 members: 4 implicit-explicit multistep schemes, 22 implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta (IMEX-RK) schemes, and 2 fully explicit schemes used for reference. The schemes are assessed for 11 different physical setups that cover laminar and turbulent regimes. Multistep and order 2 IMEX-RK methods exhibit their expected order of convergence under all circumstances. IMEX-RK methods of higher-order show occasional order reduction that impacts both algebraic and differential field variables. We ascribe the order reduction to the stiffness of the problem and, to a larger extent, the presence of the DAE. Using the popular Crank-Nicolson Adams-Bashforth of order 2 (CNAB2) integrator as reference, performance is defined by the ratio of maximum admissible time step to the cost of performing one iteration; the maximum admissible time step is determined by inspection of the time series of viscous dissipation within the system, which guarantees a physically acceptable solution. Relative performance is bounded between 0.5 and 1.5 across all studied configurations. Considering accuracy jointly with performance, we find that 6 schemes consistently outperform CNAB2, meaning that in addition to allowing for a more efficient calculation, the accuracy that they achieve at their operational limit of stability yields a lower error. In our most turbulent setup, where the behaviour of the methods is almost entirely dictated by their explicit component, 13 IMEX-RK integrators outperform CNAB2 in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.