Paper detail

An arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for products of three matrices

Consider the following noncommutative arithmetic-geometric mean inequality: given positive-semidefinite matrices $\mathbf{A}_1, \dots, \mathbf{A}_n$, the following holds for each integer $m \leq n$: $$ \frac{1}{n^m}\sum_{j_1, j_2, \dots, j_m = 1}^{n} ||| \mathbf{A}_{j_1} \mathbf{A}_{j_2} \dots \mathbf{A}_{j_m} ||| \geq \frac{(n-m)!}{n!} \sum_{\substack{j_1, j_2, \dots, j_m = 1 \\ \text{all distinct}}}^{n} ||| \mathbf{A}_{j_1} \mathbf{A}_{j_2} \dots \mathbf{A}_{j_m} |||,$$ where $||| \cdot |||$ denotes a unitarily invariant norm, including the operator norm and Schatten p-norms as special cases. While this inequality in full generality remains a conjecture, we prove that the inequality holds for products of up to three matrices, $m \leq 3$. The proofs for $m = 1,2$ are straightforward; to derive the proof for $m=3$, we appeal to a variant of the classic Araki-Lieb-Thirring inequality for permutations of matrix products.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.