Paper detail

An Approximation Algorithm for Maximum Internal Spanning Tree

Given a graph G, the {\em maximum internal spanning tree problem} (MIST for short) asks for computing a spanning tree T of G such that the number of internal vertices in T is maximized. MIST has possible applications in the design of cost-efficient communication networks and water supply networks and hence has been extensively studied in the literature. MIST is NP-hard and hence a number of polynomial-time approximation algorithms have been designed for MIST in the literature. The previously best polynomial-time approximation algorithm for MIST achieves a ratio of 3/4. In this paper, we first design a simpler algorithm that achieves the same ratio and the same time complexity as the previous best. We then refine the algorithm into a new approximation algorithm that achieves a better ratio (namely, 13/17) with the same time complexity. Our new algorithm explores much deeper structure of the problem than the previous best. The discovered structure may be used to design even better approximation or parameterized algorithms for the problem in the future.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.