Paper detail

An Approximate Projected Consensus Algorithm for Computing Intersection of Convex Sets

In this paper, we propose an approximate projected consensus algorithm for a network to cooperatively compute the intersection of convex sets. Instead of assuming the exact convex projection proposed in the literature, we allow each node to compute an approximate projection and communicate it to its neighbors. The communication graph is directed and time-varying. Nodes update their states by weighted averaging. Projection accuracy conditions are presented for the considered algorithm. They indicate how much projection accuracy is required to ensure global consensus to a point in the intersection set when the communication graph is uniformly jointly strongly connected. We show that $π/4$ is a critical angle error of the projection approximation to ensure a bounded state. A numerical example indicates that this approximate projected consensus algorithm may achieve better performance than the exact projected consensus algorithm in some cases.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.