Paper detail

An Approach to Data Prefetching Using 2-Dimensional Selection Criteria

We propose an approach to data memory prefetching which augments the standard prefetch buffer with selection criteria based on performance and usage pattern of a given instruction. This approach is built on top of a pattern matching based prefetcher, specifically one which can choose between a stream, a stride, or a stream followed by a stride. We track the most recently called instructions to make a decision on the quantity of data to prefetch next. The decision is based on the frequency with which these instructions are called and the hit/miss rate of the prefetcher. In our approach, we separate the amount of data to prefetch into three categories: a high degree, a standard degree and a low degree. We ran tests on different values for the high prefetch degree, standard prefetch degree and low prefetch degree to determine that the most optimal combination was 1, 4, 8 lines respectively. The 2 dimensional selection criteria improved the performance of the prefetcher by up to 9.5% over the first data prefetching championship winner. Unfortunately performance also fell by as much as 14%, but remained similar on average across all of the benchmarks we tested.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.