Paper detail

An approach to constrain models of accreting neutron stars with the use of an equation of state

We investigate X-ray bursts during the thermal evolution of an accreting neutron star which corresponds to the X-ray burster GS\ 1826-24. Physical quantities of the neutron star are included using an equation of state below and above the nuclear matter density. We adopt an equation of state and construct an approximate network that saves the computational time and calculates nuclear energy generation rates accompanying the abundance evolutions. The mass and radius of the neutron star are got by solving the stellar evolution equations from the center to the surface which involve necessary information such as the nuclear energy generation in accreting layers, heating from the crust, and neutrino emissions inside the stellar core. We reproduce the light curve and recurrence time of the X-ray burst from GS 1826-24 within the standard deviation of 1$σ$ for the assumed accretion rate, metallicity, and equation of state. It is concluded that the observed recurrence time is consistent with the theoretical model having metallicity of the initial CNO elements $Z_{\rm CNO}$ = 0.01. We suggest that the nuclear reaction rates responsible for the $rp$-process should be examined in detail, because the rates may change the shape of the light curve and our conclusion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.