Paper detail

An application of the weighted discrete Hardy inequality

In a note published in 1925, G. H. Hardy stated the inequality \begin{equation*} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n a_k \right)^p \leq \left(\frac{p}{p-1}\right)^p \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n^p, \end{equation*} for any non-negative sequence $\{a_n\}_{n \geq 1}$, and $p>1$. This inequality is known in the literature as the classical discrete Hardy inequality. It has been widely studied and several applications and new versions have been shown. In this work, we use a characterization of a weighted version of this inequality to exhibit a sufficient condition for the existence of solutions of the differential equation ${\rm div}\,{\bf u}=f$ in weighted Sobolev spaces over a certain plane irregular domain. The solvability of this equation is fundamental for the analysis of the Stokes equations. The proof follows from a local-to-global argument based on a certain decomposition of functions which is also of interest for its applications to other inequalities or related results in Sobolev spaces, such as the Korn inequality.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.