Paper detail

An application of extreme value statistics to the most massive galaxy clusters at low and high redshifts

In this work we present an application of general extreme value statistics (GEV) to very massive single clusters at high and low redshifts. After introducing the formalism, we apply this statistics to four very massive high redshift clusters. Those clusters comprise ACT-CL J0102-4915 with a mass of M_200m=(2.16+/-0.32)x10^{15} M_sun at a redshift of z=0.87, SPT-CL J2106-5844 with a mass of M_200m=(1.27+/-0.21)x10^{15} M_sun at z=1.132 and two clusters found by the XMM-Newton Distant Cluster Project survey: XMMU J2235.32557 with a mass of M_200c= (7.3+/-1.3)x10^{14} M_sun located at a redshift of z=1.4 and XMMU J0044.0-2033 having a mass in the range of M_200c= (3.5-5.0)x10^{14} M_sun at z=1.579. By relating those systems to their corresponding distribution functions of being the most massive system in a given survey area, we find that none of the systems alone is in extreme tension with LCDM. We confront these results with a GEV analysis of four very massive low redshift clusters: A2163, A370, RXJ1347-1145 and 1E0657-558, finding no tendency of the high-z systems to be more extreme than the low-z ones. In addition, we study the extreme quantiles of single clusters at high-z and present contour plots for fixed quantiles in the mass vs. survey area plane for four redshift intervals, finding that, in order to be significantly in conflict with LCDM, cluster masses would have to be substantially higher than the currently observed ones.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.