Paper detail

An anisotropic minijets model for the GRB prompt emission

In order to explain rapid light curve variability without invoking a variable source, several authors have proposed "minijets" that move relativistically relative to the main flow of the jet. Here we consider the possibility that these minijets, instead of being isotropically distributed in the comoving frame of the jet, form primarily perpendicular to the direction of the flow, as the jet dissipates its energy at a large emission radius. This yields two robust features. First, the emission is significantly delayed compared with the isotropic case. This delay allows for the peak of the afterglow emission to appear while the source is still active, in contrast to the simplest isotropic model. Secondly, the flux decline after the source turns off is steeper than the isotropic case. We find that these two features are realized in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): 1. The peak of most GeV light curves (ascribed to the external shock) appears during the prompt emission phase. 2. Many X-ray light curves exhibit a period of steep decay, which is faster than that predicted by the standard isotropic case. The gamma-ray generation mechanism in GRBs, and possibly in other relativistic flows, may therefore be anisotropic.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.