Paper detail

An Android Application Risk Evaluation Framework Based on Minimum Permission Set Identification

Android utilizes a security mechanism that requires apps to request permission for accessing sensitive user data, e.g., contacts and SMSs, or certain system features, e.g., camera and Internet access. However, Android apps tend to be overprivileged, i.e., they often request more permissions than necessary. This raises the security problem of overprivilege. To alleviate the overprivilege problem, this paper proposes MPDroid, an approach that combines static analysis and collaborative filtering to identify the minimum permissions for an Android app based on its app description and API usage. Given an app, MPDroid first employs collaborative filtering to identify the initial minimum permissions for the app. Then, through static analysis, the final minimum permissions that an app really needs are identified. Finally, it evaluates the overprivilege risk by inspecting the apps extra privileges, i.e., the unnecessary permissions requested by the app. Experiments are conducted on 16,343 popular apps collected from Google Play. The results show that MPDroid outperforms the state-of-the-art approach significantly.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.