Paper detail

An analytical study of flatness and intermittency through Riemann's non-differentiable functions

In the study of turbulence, intermittency is a measure of how much Kolmogorov's theory of 1941 deviates from experiments. It is quantified with the flatness of the velocity of the fluid, usually based on structure functions in the physical space. However, it can also be defined with Fourier high-pass filters. Experimental and numerical simulations suggest that the two approaches do not always give the same results. Our purpose is to compare them from the analytical point of view of functions. We do that by studying generalizations of Riemann's non-differentiable function, yielding computations that are related to some classical problems in Fourier analysis. The conclusion is that the result strongly depends on regularity. To visualize this, we establish an analogy between these generalizations and the influence of viscosity in turbulent flows. This article is motivated by the mathematical works on the multifractal formalism and the discovery of Riemann's non-differentiable function as a trajectory of polygonal vortex filaments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.