Paper detail

An analytical model for the 0.33 - 7.85 micron transmission spectrum of HD189733b : Effect of stellar spots

In this paper an analytical theory is used to complete the transmission spectrum of HD189733b from near-ultraviolet to infrared (0.33 - 7.85 $μm$). The model suggests a new approach which take into account the quantity of light transmitted through the planetary atmosphere and the thermal emissions from the night side of the planet, to describe the transmission spectrum of HD189733b in photometric study. The availability of measures in different wavelengths has allowed us to validate our model with more efficiency. We found an agreement between our transmission spectrum model of HD189733b and data from the infrared to the UV. The model predicts a value of $R_p /R_\star$ $= 0.1516$ at $7.3 μm$, which is a low value compared to all observations at different wavelengths. We interpreted this value by a fluorescence emission from sulphur dioxide ($SO_2$). Therefore, the likely presence of these molecules in the atmosphere of HD 189733b. The second objective of this paper is to study the effect of starspots on the transmission spectrum of this hot-Jupiter. To reach this goal, we developed an analytical theory considered as an extension of the approach proposed by Berta et al. (2011). The model shows clearly that the unocculted spots would significantly increase the transit radius ratio at visible and near-ultraviolet wavelengths, while having a minimal impact at infrared wavelengths. Therefore, the wavelength dependence of the spots effect has been clearly shown by this new model. At the end of this paper, we reported the way in which this model can provide an estimation of the percentage of the unocculted spots area relative to stellar disk area for an observation of HD189733 performed in a given epoch and at a given wavelength.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.