Paper detail

An analytical formulation for roughness based on celular automata

We present a method to derive the analytical expression of the roughness of a fractal surface whose dynamics is ruled by cellular automata. Starting from the automata, we write down the the time derivative of the height's average and variance. By assuming the equiprobability of the surface configurations and taking the limit of large substrates we find the roughness as a function of time. As expected, the function behaves as $t^β$ when $t\ll t_\times$ and saturate at $w_s$ when $t\gg t_\times$. We apply the methodology to describe the etching model \citep{Bernardo}, however, the value of $β$ we obtained are not the one predicted by the KPZ equation and observed in numerical experiments. That divergence may be due to the equiprobability assumption. We redefine the roughness with an exponent that compensate the nonuniform probability generated by the celular automata, resulting in an expression that perfectly matches the experimental results.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.