Paper detail

An analytic parameterization of self-gravity wakes in Saturn's rings, with application to occultations and propellers

We have developed a semi-analytic method of parameterizing N-body simulations of self-gravity wakes in Saturn's rings, describing their properties by means of only 6 numbers: 3 optical depths and 3 weighting factors. These numbers are obtained using a density-estimation procedure that finds the frequencies of various values of local density within a simulated ring patch. Application of our parameterization to a suite of N-body simulations implies that the distribution of local optical depths is trimodal, rather than bimodal as previous authors have assumed. Rings dominated by self-gravity wakes appear to be mostly empty space. The implications of this result for the analysis of occultation data are more conceptual than practical. The only adjustment needed is that the model parameter $τ_{gap}$ should be interpreted as representing the area-weighted average optical depth within the gaps (or inter-wake regions). The most significant consequence of our results applies to the question of why "propeller" structures observed in the mid-A ring are seen as relative-bright features, even though the most prominent features of simulated propellers are regions of relatively low density. We find preliminary quantitative support for the hypothesis that propellers would be bright if they involve a local and temporary disruption of self-gravity wakes, flooding the region with more "photometrically active" material (i.e., material that can contribute to the rings' local optical depth) even though the overall density is lower, and thus raising their apparent brightnesses in agreement with observations. We suggest that this mechanism be tested by future detailed numerical models.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.