Paper detail

An Analysis of the Power Imbalance on the Uplink of Power-Domain NOMA

This paper analyzes the power imbalance factor on the uplink of a 2-user Power-domain NOMA system and reveals that the minimum value of the average error probability is achieved when the user signals are perfectly balanced in terms of power as in Multi-User MIMO with power control. The analytic result is obtained by analyzing the pairwise error probability and exploiting a symmetry property of the error events. This result is supported by computer simulations using the QPSK and 16QAM signal formats and uncorrelated Rayleigh fading channels. This finding leads to the questioning of the basic philosophy of Power-domain NOMA and suggests that the best strategy for uncorrelated channels is to perfectly balance the average signal powers received from the users and to use a maximum likelihood receiver for their detection.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.