Paper detail

An Analysis of How Spatiotemporal Dynamic Models of Brain Activity Could Improve MEG/EEG Inverse Solutions

MEG and EEG are noninvasive functional neuroimaging techniques that provide recordings of brain activity with high temporal resolution, and thus provide a unique window to study fast time-scale neural dynamics in humans. However, the accuracy of brain activity estimates resulting from these data is limited mainly because 1) the number of sensors is much smaller than the number of sources, and 2) the low sensitivity of the recording device to deep or radially oriented sources. These factors limit the number of sources that can be recovered and bias estimates to superficial cortical areas, resulting in the need to include a priori information about the source activity. The question of how to specify this information and how it might lead to improved solutions remains a critical open problem. In this paper we show that the incorporation of knowledge about the brain's underlying connectivity and spatiotemporal dynamics could dramatically improve inverse solutions. To do this, we develop the concept of the \textit{dynamic lead field mapping}, which expresses how information about source activity at a given time is mapped not only to the immediate measurement, but to a time series of measurements. With this mapping we show that the number of source parameters that can be recovered could increase by up to a factor of ${\sim20}$, and that such improvement is primarily represented by deep cortical areas. Our result implies that future developments in MEG/EEG analysis that model spatialtemporal dynamics have the potential to dramatically increase source resolution.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.