Paper detail

An alternative description of gravitational radiation from black holes based on the Regge poles of the ${\cal S}$-matrix and the associated residues

We advocate for an alternative description of gravitational radiation from black holes based on complex angular momentum techniques (analytic continuation of partial wave expansions, duality of the ${\cal S}$-matrix and effective resummations involving its Regge poles and the associated residues, Regge trajectories, semiclassical interpretations, etc.). Such techniques, which proved to be very helpful in various areas of physics to describe and analyze resonant scattering, were only marginally used in the context of black hole physics. Here, by considering the multipolar waveform generated by a massive particle falling radially from infinity into a Schwarzschild black hole, we show that they could play a fundamental role in gravitational-wave physics. More precisely, from the multipole expansion defining the Weyl scalar $Ψ_4$, we extract the Fourier transform of a sum over Regge poles and their residues which can be evaluated numerically from the associated Regge trajectories. This Regge pole approximation permits us to reconstruct, for an arbitrary direction of observation, a large part of the multipolar waveform $Ψ_4$. In particular, it can reproduce with very good agreement the quasinormal ringdown as well as with rather good agreement the tail of the signal. This is achieved even if we take into account only one Regge pole and, if a large number of modes are excited, the result can be improved by considering additional poles. Moreover, while quasinormal-mode contributions do not provide physically relevant results at "early times" due to their exponentially divergent behavior as time decreases, it is not necessary to determine from physical considerations a starting time for the Regge ringdown.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.