Paper detail

An Alternative Between Non-unique and Negative Yamabe Solutions to the Conformal Formulation of the Einstein Constraint Equations

The conformal method has been effective for parametrizing solutions to the Einstein constraint equations on closed 3-manifolds. However, it is still not well-understood; for example, existence of solutions to the conformal equations for zero or negative Yamabe metrics is still unknown without the so-called ``CMC'' or ``near-CMC'' assumptions. The first existence results without such assumptions, termed the ``far-from-CMC'' case, were obtained by Holst, Nagy, and Tsogtgerel in 2008 for positive Yamabe metrics. However, their results are based on topological arguments, and as a result solution uniqueness is not known. Indeed, Maxwell gave evidence in 2011 that far-from-CMC solutions are not unique in certain cases. In this article, we provide further insight by establishing a type of alternative theorem for general far-from-CMC solutions. For a given manifold M that admits a metric of positive scalar curvature and scalar flat metric g(0) with no conformal Killing fields, we first prove existence of an analytic, one-parameter family of metrics g(z) through g(0) such that R(g(z)) = z. Using this family of metrics and given data (tau,sigma,rho,j), we form a one-parameter family of operators F((phi,w),z) whose zeros satisfy the conformal equations. Applying Liapnuov-Schmidt reduction, we determine an analytic solution curve for F((phi,w),z) = 0 through a critical point where the linearization of F((phi,w),z) vanishes. The regularity of this curve, the definition of F((phi,w),z), and the earlier far-from-CMC results of Holst et al. allow us to then prove the following alternative theorem for far-from-CMC solutions: either (1) there exists a z_1 >0 such that (positive Yamabe) solutions to the z_1-parameterized conformal equations are non-unique; or (2) there exists z_2 < 0 such that (negative Yamabe) solutions to the z_2-parameterized conformal equations exist.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.