Paper detail

An Algorithm for Ennola's Second Theorem and Counting Smooth Numbers in Practice

Let $Ψ(x,y)$ count the number of positive integers $n\le x$ such that every prime divisor of $n$ is at most $y$. Given inputs $x$ and $y$, what is the best way to estimate $Ψ(x,y)$? We address this problem in three ways: with a new algorithm to estimate $Ψ(x,y)$, with a performance improvement to an established algorithm, and with empirically based advice on how to choose an algorithm to estimate $Ψ$ for the given inputs. Our new algorithm to estimate $Ψ(x,y)$ is based on Ennola&#39;s second theorem [Ennola69], which applies when $y< (\log x)^{3/4-ε}$ for $ε>0$. It takes $O(y^2/\log y)$ arithmetic operations of precomputation and $O(y\log y)$ operations per evaluation of $Ψ$. We show how to speed up Algorithm HT, which is based on the saddle-point method of Hildebrand and Tenenbaum [1986], by a factor proportional to $\log\log x$, by applying Newton&#39;s method in a new way. And finally we give our empirical advice based on five algorithms to compute estimates for $Ψ(x,y)$.The challenge here is that the boundaries of the ranges of applicability, as given in theorems, often include unknown constants or small values of $ε>0$, for example, that cannot be programmed directly.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.