Paper detail

An Adjustable Farthest Point Sampling Method for Approximately-sorted Point Cloud Data

Sampling is an essential part of raw point cloud data processing such as in the popular PointNet++ scheme. Farthest Point Sampling (FPS), which iteratively samples the farthest point and performs distance updating, is one of the most popular sampling schemes. Unfortunately it suffers from low efficiency and can become the bottleneck of point cloud applications. We propose adjustable FPS (AFPS), parameterized by M, to aggressively reduce the complexity of FPS without compromising on the sampling performance. Specifically, it divides the original point cloud into M small point clouds and samples M points simultaneously. It exploits the dimensional locality of an approximately sorted point cloud data to minimize its performance degradation. AFPS method can achieve 22 to 30x speedup over original FPS. Furthermore, we propose the nearest-point-distance-updating (NPDU) method to limit the number of distance updates to a constant number. The combined NPDU on AFPS method can achieve a 34-280x speedup on a point cloud with 2K-32K points with algorithmic performance that is comparable to the original FPS. For instance, for the ShapeNet part segmentation task, it achieves 0.8490 instance average mIoU (mean Intersection of Union), which is only 0.0035 drop compared to the original FPS.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.