Paper detail

An adiabatic superconductor comparator with 46 nA sensitivity

Adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron (AQFP) circuits can operate with extremely small energy dissipation (~1 zJ per junction at 5 GHz) and high sensitivity (~1 μA) owing to adiabatic switching. Thus, AQFP logic is suitable to use as readout interfaces for cryogenic detectors, such as superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SSPDs). In order to extend the application of AQFP logic to various detectors, it is crucial to achieve even better sensitivity because some detectors, such as WSi SSPDs and transition edge sensors (TESs), require sub-μA sensitivity. In the present study, we propose a high-sensitivity AQFP comparator with a current transformer (CT), which increases the equivalent input current and thereby improves the sensitivity. Numerical simulation shows that the proposed comparator achieves a sensitivity approximately six times better than that of a conventional AQFP comparator. Furthermore, we demonstrate a sensitivity of 46 nA at 4.2 K for a sampling frequency of 500 Hz in the experiment.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.