Paper detail

An accretion model for the eclipsing cataclysmic variable PG0859+415

The emission lines found in the majority of cataclysmic variables are generally used as tracers of accretion flows which dominate the light at optical wavelengths. It has been suggested from previous observations that the eclipsing nova-like variable PG0859+415 shows individualistic orbital characteristics which are inconsistent with canonical models of stellar accretion. We present spectrophotometry of this star which suggest that the standard picture is not in conflict with observation. We provide evidence that the shallow optical eclipses are of an extended bright spot rather than the accretion disc, and that the low-excitation lines are dominated by a transient absorption component, perhaps a result of the bright spot or accretion stream eclipsing the disc. We argue that this object may be another nova-like variable displaying long-term or cyclic variations in mass-transfer rate from the secondary star.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.